<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CFTC LAW &#187; NFA Amendments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cftclaw.com/category/nfa/nfa-amendments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cftclaw.com</link>
	<description>Commentaries on Forex, Futures and Commodities Regulations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Forex Dealer Member Financial Requirements</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2010/02/forex-dealer-member-financial-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2010/02/forex-dealer-member-financial-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Financial Requirements Section 11(b) and (c) prohibit Forex Dealer Members (FDMs) from including assets held at unregulated persons as current assets for purposes of determining adjusted net capital and from using such unregulated persons to cover currency positions. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pursuant to Section 17(j) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, NFA hereby submits to the CFTC proposed <a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/PDF/CFTC/FRSec11_FDM_InterpNotc_re_Forex_Trans_022210wTSsignature.pdf">amendments</a> to Financial Requirements Sections 11(b) and (c) regarding Forex Dealer Member financial requirements and the Interpretive Notice regarding Forex Transactions. NFA’s Board of Directors approved this proposal on February 18, 2010.</p>
<p>Financial Requirements Section 11(b) and (c) prohibit Forex Dealer Members (FDMs) from including assets held at unregulated persons as current assets for purposes of determining adjusted net capital and from using such unregulated persons to cover currency positions. The rule defines a person as unregulated unless it is one of the persons enumerated in the rule. The enumerated persons include, among others, futures commission merchants registered with the CFTC and brokerdealers registered with the SEC, as well as certain entities regulated as a foreign equivalent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2010/02/forex-dealer-member-financial-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimum Net Capital Requirements for Futures Commission Merchants and Introducing Brokers</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2010/02/minimum-net-capital-requirements-for-futures-commission-merchants-and-introducing-brokers/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2010/02/minimum-net-capital-requirements-for-futures-commission-merchants-and-introducing-brokers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pursuant to Section 17(j) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, the NFA hereby submitted to the CFTC proposed amendments to Financial Requirements Section 1 regarding minimum net capital requirements for futures commission merchants and introducing brokers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Minimum Net Capital Requirements for</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Futures Commission Merchants and Introducing Brokers</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">Pursuant to Section 17(j) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, the NFA hereby submitted to the CFTC proposed <a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/PDF/CFTC/FRSec1_FC_IB_MinNetCapRequire_022210wTSsignature.pdf">amendments</a> to Financial Requirements Section 1 regarding minimum net capital requirements for futures commission merchants and introducing brokers. NFA’s Board of Directors approved this proposal on February 18, 2010.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;"><span style="font-family: SymbolMT; mso-bidi-font-family: SymbolMT; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">• </span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">Increase the minimum dollar capital requirement from $500,000 to $1,000,000;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;"><span style="font-family: SymbolMT; mso-bidi-font-family: SymbolMT; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">• </span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">Increase the risk-based capital requirement for non-customer accounts from 4% to 8% of the total risk margin requirement for positions carried in non-customer accounts; and</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-layout-grid-align: none; text-autospace: none;"><span style="font-family: SymbolMT; mso-bidi-font-family: SymbolMT; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">• </span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">Include cleared over-the counter derivative positions in an FCM&#8217;s risk based capital calculation for customer and non-customer accounts.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2010/02/minimum-net-capital-requirements-for-futures-commission-merchants-and-introducing-brokers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFA may make effective proposed amendments regarding the use of internet and on-line social networking groups</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2010/01/nfa-may-make-effective-proposed-amendments-regarding-the-use-of-internet-and-on-line-social-networking-groups/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2010/01/nfa-may-make-effective-proposed-amendments-regarding-the-use-of-internet-and-on-line-social-networking-groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NFA has received notice from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (&#8221;CFTC&#8221;) that NFA may make effective certain proposed amendments regarding the use of internet and on-line social networking groups when communicating with the public. The Interpretive Notice entitled &#8220;Use of On-Line Social Networking Groups to Communicate with the Public&#8221; makes clear that on-line communications are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NFA has received notice from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (&#8221;CFTC&#8221;) that NFA may make effective certain proposed amendments regarding the use of internet and on-line social networking groups when communicating with the public. The Interpretive Notice entitled &#8220;Use of On-Line Social Networking Groups to Communicate with the Public&#8221; makes clear that on-line communications are subject to the same standards as other types of communications with the public and provides guidance to Members to meet their responsibilities in this area. The Interpretive Notice became effective on December 24, 2009.</p>
<p>A related amendment to Compliance Rule 2-29(h) requires that any audio or video distributed through media accessible by the public (e.g., through the internet) that makes any specific trading recommendation or refers to the extent of profit previously obtained or achievable in the future must be submitted to NFA for review and approval at least 10 days prior to first use. In this way the amendment subjects certain on-line advertising to the same requirements as similar television and radio advertising. To allow Members sufficient time to submit these types of advertisements to NFA for approval, the amendment becomes effective as of February 1, 2010. Accordingly, any audio or video advertisements that a Member posts on-line after January 31, 2010, must have been previously reviewed and approved by NFA.</p>
<p>NFA&#8217;s December 8, 2009, submission letter to the CFTC contains a more detailed explanation of the changes. You can access an electronic copy of the submission letter at: <a style="color: #2a5db0;" href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/PDF/CFTC/CR2-29_IntNotc_re_OnLine_Social_Networking_120209.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/PDF/CFTC/CR2-29_IntNotc_re_OnLine_Social_Networking_120209.pdf</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2010/01/nfa-may-make-effective-proposed-amendments-regarding-the-use-of-internet-and-on-line-social-networking-groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFA guidelines on the use of social networking groups</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2009/12/nfa-guidelines-on-the-use-of-social-networking-groups/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2009/12/nfa-guidelines-on-the-use-of-social-networking-groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On-line Social Networking Groups &#8211; Proposed Amendments to NFA&#8217;s Compliance Rule 2-29(h) and Adoption of Interpretive Notice
On-line social networking groups have changed the way people make trading decisions. A number of NFA Members sponsor blogs, chat rooms, and forums (also called message or bulletin boards), and some use sites like Facebook or Twitter for business [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/PDF/CFTC/CR2-29_IntNotc_re_OnLine_Social_Networking_120209.pdf">On-line Social Networking Groups &#8211; Proposed Amendments to NFA&#8217;s Compliance Rule 2-29(h) and Adoption of Interpretive Notice</a></p>
<p>On-line social networking groups have changed the way people make trading decisions. A number of NFA Members sponsor blogs, chat rooms, and forums (also called message or bulletin boards), and some use sites like Facebook or Twitter for business purposes. Associates may also sponsor or participate in these groups. Unfortunately, these on-line communities provide opportunities for posters to spread unsubstantiated rumors and intentional misrepresentations. The form of communication does not change the obligations of Members and Associates who host or participate in these groups, and electronic communications must comply with Compliance Rules 2-9, 2-29, 2-36, and 2-39.</p>
<p>NFA’s interpretive notice entitled NFA Compliance Rule 2-9: Supervisory Procedures for E-Mail and the Use of Web Site,” (NFA Manual, ¶ 9037) provides guidance on how NFA’s promotional material and supervision rules relate to email and web sites but does not specifically address other types of electronic communications. This notice discusses a Member or Associate’s responsibilities in connection with on-line social networking facilities such as blogs, chat rooms, forums, Facebook, and Twitter.</p>
<p>Obviously, any electronic content that can be viewed by the general public, or even by a more closed community that includes current and potential customers, can be promotional material. For example, blogs dealing with commodity futures or options are promotional material when written by an NFA Member or Associate, and forex blogs are promotional material when written by a Member or Associate subject to the forex rules.</p>
<p>Therefore, content generated by the Member or Associate is subject to the requirements of NFA Compliance Rules 2-29, 2-36, or 2-39. The same is true for futures, options, or forex content written by a Member or Associate and posted on a third party’s site.</p>
<p>The issue becomes more complicated for user-generated comments responding to a Member or Associate’s blog and for Members and Associates who host chat rooms or forums. What is their responsibility for posts from customers or others over whom the Member or Associate has no direct control? When inadequately monitored, social networking sites may contain misleading information, lure customers into trades that they would not normally make, or be used in an attempt to manipulate prices.</p>
<p>If a Member or Associate hosts a blog, a chat room, or a forum where futures or forex are discussed, the Member or Associate is required to supervise the use of that community. This requires, at a minimum, that the Member or Associate regularly monitor the content of the sites it hosts, take down any misleading or otherwise fraudulent posts, and ban users for egregious or repeat violations. Not only are these actions required by NFA’s supervision rules, they are both common sense and common practice. Similar requirements apply to Facebook and other sites that allow others to post to the Member or Associate’s “wall” or other assessable area.</p>
<p>Audio pod-casts and videos on the Internet—whether on the Member or Associate’s Web site or on an independent site such as You-Tube—are similar to radio and television advertisements. If they make specific trading recommendations or refer to profits that have been obtained in the past or can be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2009/12/nfa-guidelines-on-the-use-of-social-networking-groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFA proposes amendments to the Interpretive Notice regarding Forex Transactions</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2009/12/nfa-proposes-amendments-to-the-interpretive-notice-regarding-forex-transactions/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2009/12/nfa-proposes-amendments-to-the-interpretive-notice-regarding-forex-transactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NFA Bylaw 1301(e) requires Forex Dealer Members to pay annual dues that are
graduated according to the firm&#8217;s gross annual revenue from customers (e.g.,
commissions, mark-ups, mark-downs) for its forex activities. Profits and losses
from proprietary trades are not to be included. To calculate dues:
• Start with the FCM dues imposed by NFA Bylaw 1301(b)(ii);
• Add $44,375 if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NFA Bylaw 1301(e) requires Forex Dealer Members to pay annual dues that are<br />
graduated according to the firm&#8217;s gross annual revenue from customers (e.g.,<br />
commissions, mark-ups, mark-downs) for its forex activities. Profits and losses<br />
from proprietary trades are not to be included. To calculate dues:<br />
• Start with the FCM dues imposed by NFA Bylaw 1301(b)(ii);<br />
• Add $44,375 if the Forex Dealer Member&#8217;s gross annual revenue from<br />
forex transactions is $500,000 or less;<br />
• Add $69,375 if the Forex Dealer Member&#8217;s gross annual revenue from<br />
forex transactions is more than $500,000, but not more than $2,000,000;<br />
• Add $94,375 if the Forex Dealer Member&#8217;s gross annual revenue from<br />
forex transactions is more than $2,000,000, but not more than $5,000,000;<br />
or<br />
• Add $119,375 if the Forex Dealer Member&#8217;s gross annual revenue from<br />
these activities is more than $5,000,000.</p>
<p>These dues apply when the Forex Dealer Member offers to be a counterparty to<br />
a forex transaction or accepts a forex trade (whichever is earlier), and NFA will<br />
send the Member an invoice for the minimum dues ($50,000 or $45,875) minus<br />
any amount already paid for that membership year. Thereafter, the dues will be<br />
assessed on the firm&#8217;s membership renewal date and will be based on the Forex<br />
Dealer Member&#8217;s latest certified financial statement.</p>
<p><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(<a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/PDF/CFTC/IntNotc_Bylaw_1301_FDM_Dues_120209.pdf">proposed amendment</a>)</span><br />
</em><em>The only exception to the dues set forth above is a situation in which NFA does<br />
not serve as the DSRO for a Forex Dealer Member and the DSRO has agreed to<br />
examine the Forex Dealer Member&#8217;s forex activities. In this case, the surcharge<br />
paid by the Forex Dealer Member, regardless of gross annual revenue, is<br />
$12,000. Accordingly, for such a Forex Dealer Member the dues to be assessed<br />
at the time it offers to be a counterparty to a forex transaction or accepts a forex<br />
trade (whichever is earlier), and on its membership renewal date thereafter, will<br />
be $13,500.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2009/12/nfa-proposes-amendments-to-the-interpretive-notice-regarding-forex-transactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFA proposes amendments to Financial Requirements Section 15 regarding FDM internal financial controls</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2009/12/nfa-proposes-amendments-to-financial-requirements-section-15-regarding-fdm-internal-financial-controls/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2009/12/nfa-proposes-amendments-to-financial-requirements-section-15-regarding-fdm-internal-financial-controls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Financial Requirements Section 15 currently requires firms to provide NFA with an internal control report prior to acting as an FDM. This report must be prepared by an independent public accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and must include representations by the accountant that the FDM’s internal financial controls have no material [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Financial Requirements Section 15 currently requires firms to provide NFA with an internal control report prior to acting as an FDM. This report must be prepared by an independent public accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and must include representations by the accountant that the FDM’s internal financial controls have no material weaknesses. NFA adopted this rule after taking a number of Member Responsibility Actions against FDMs with inadequate internal financial controls.<br />
Additionally, reputable public accounting firms have informed NFA that AICPA auditing standards require accountants to test live transactions before making representations about the adequacy of internal controls, and they cannot do this testing for firms that have not yet begun business. Therefore, the <a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/PDF/CFTC/FRSec15_FDM_Internal_Financial_Controls_120209.pdf">amendments</a> to Section 15 eliminate the specific requirement for an internal control report prior to acting as an FDM and replace it with a more general requirement that the Member must demonstrate that it has adequate internal financial controls. This requirement will continue to put the burden on the Member but will provide more flexibility. Section 15 will continue to authorize NFA to require any FDM to provide an internal control report if NFA believes that the Member’s controls are inadequate:</p>
<p>-If NFA believes that a Member’s internal controls are inadequate at any time, NFA’s Compliance Director may require it to provide to NFA an internal control report that is prepared and certified by an independent public accountant who is registered under Section 102 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2009/12/nfa-proposes-amendments-to-financial-requirements-section-15-regarding-fdm-internal-financial-controls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFA amends Code of Arbitration and Member Arbitration Rules</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2009/09/nfa-amends-code-of-arbitration-and-member-arbitration-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2009/09/nfa-amends-code-of-arbitration-and-member-arbitration-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The amendments modify the monetary thresholds for determining whether a case is processed as a summary proceeding or an oral hearing and the number of arbitrators NFA appoints to a case. The rule changes will apply to all cases filed on or after October 1. The NFA has increased the standard threshold for three arbitrator [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/PDF/CFTC/Code_of_Arb_Sec_Memb_Rules_082009.pdf">amendments</a> modify the monetary thresholds for determining whether a case is processed as a summary proceeding or an oral hearing and the number of arbitrators NFA appoints to a case. The rule changes will apply to all cases filed on or after October 1. The NFA has increased the standard threshold for three arbitrator pannals to over $100,000. Claim amounts that are less than or equal to $50,000 will now generally be processed as summary proceedings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2009/09/nfa-amends-code-of-arbitration-and-member-arbitration-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Members must retain a registered Principal over whom NFA has jurisdiction</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2009/06/members-must-retain-a-registered-principal-over-whom-nfa-has-jurisdiction/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2009/06/members-must-retain-a-registered-principal-over-whom-nfa-has-jurisdiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FCM Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Failure to retain at least one Principal registered as an “associated person” will henceforth be regarded by the NFA as a request to withdraw from NFA membership, unless membership is in the contract market category.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failure to retain at least one Principal registered as an “associated person” will henceforth be regarded by the NFA as a request to withdraw from NFA membership, unless membership is in the contract market category. This <a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/.%5CPDF%5CCFTC%5CBylaw301_060509.pdf">amends</a> NFA bylaw 301 (a)(iii), which now reads:</p>
<p>No person, unless eligible for membership in the contract market category, shall be eligible to become or remain a Member unless at least one of its principals is registered as an &#8220;associated person&#8221; under the Act and Commission Rules.</p>
<p>(1) <span style="text-decoration: underline;">If any Member fails to have at least one principal that is registered as an &#8220;associated person&#8221; NFA shall deem that Member&#8217;s failure to be a request to withdraw from NFA membership and shall notify that Member accordingly.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2009/06/members-must-retain-a-registered-principal-over-whom-nfa-has-jurisdiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New security deposit requirements cap leverage</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2009/02/new-security-deposit-requirements-cap-leverage/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2009/02/new-security-deposit-requirements-cap-leverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FDMs must collect security deposits of 1% of notional value on major currency pairs and 4% on other currency pairs. FDMs that maintain 150% of their capital requirement will be exempted. The Interpretive Notice cites customer safety as a reason for the leverage restrictions. It also notes that the new standards bring security deposit requirements [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FDMs must collect security deposits of 1% of notional value on major currency pairs and 4% on other currency pairs. FDMs that maintain 150% of their capital requirement will be exempted. The <a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/.%5CPDF%5CCFTC%5CFRSec12_IntNotc021909.pdf">Interpretive Notice</a> cites customer safety as a reason for the leverage restrictions. It also notes that the new standards bring security deposit requirements in the retail forex industry more in line with typical IMM margins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2009/02/new-security-deposit-requirements-cap-leverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New capital requirements for FDMs</title>
		<link>http://cftclaw.com/2009/02/new-capital-requirements-for-fdms/</link>
		<comments>http://cftclaw.com/2009/02/new-capital-requirements-for-fdms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Felix Shipkevich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftclaw.com/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to the $20 million required by the CFTC Reauthorization Act of 2008, FDMs with over $10 million in customer liabilities and will be subject to capital requirements that take into account their total liabilities. FDMs that execute customer transactions exclusively via STP will be exempted. In general, the following formula will apply:
Amount required [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the $20 million required by the CFTC Reauthorization Act of 2008, FDMs with over $10 million in customer liabilities and will be subject to capital requirements that take into account their total liabilities. FDMs that execute customer transactions exclusively via STP will be exempted. In general, the following formula will apply:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/.%5CPDF%5CCFTC%5CFRSec11_IntNotc021909.pdf">Amount required by (a)(i) + .05(customer liabilities &#8211; $10,000,000</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cftclaw.com/2009/02/new-capital-requirements-for-fdms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
